Friday, September 27, 2019

Happy Birth Day Bhaghat Singh: He was killed by Court in 1931 during Raj

Happy Birth Day Bhaghat Singh

He was killed by Court in 1931 during Raj

Born in a Sindhu Jat family at 28th September 1907 and killed by court orders under the pressure of British Indian establishment at 23rd March 1931, Bhaghat Singh is still alive among people. He had exposed colonialism in his life and his hanging exposed so-called justice and rule of law well. 


آج بھگت سنگھ شہید کا 112 واں جنم دیہاڑ ہے۔ اس پنجابی نوجوان کا عدالتی قتل ، برٹش دور کی بدترین مثالوں میں سے ایک ہے۔
انگریزوں کے ظالمانہ قبضے کے خلاف علمِ بغاوت بلند کرنے والوں میں ایک معتبر نام۔۔۔پنجاب کے ضلع فیصل آباد کی تحصیل جڑانوالہ کے چک 105 بنگہ میں 1907 کو پیدا ہونے والے بھگت سنگھ کا  ہے۔
سندھو جٹوں کے گھر پیدا ہونے والے  اس نوجوان کو بھری جوانی میں ایک بدترین عدالتی فیصلے کے بعد محض 24 سال کی عمر میں برٹش سٹیبلشمنٹ نے پھانسی چڑھا دیا تھا۔
اسکی پھانسی سے 18 دن قبل انگریز  وائسرائےلارڈ ارون اور مہاتما گاندھی میں سیاسی قیدیوں کی رہائی کا معاہدہ گاندھی ارون  پیکٹ ہوا تھا، مگر انصاف کے دعویدار انگریزوں نے بھگت سنگھ اور اسکے ساتھیوں کو سیاسی قیدی ماننے سے انکار کر دیا اور سیاسی قیدیوں کو چھڑوانے والے بھی چپ رہے۔۔۔ بھگت سنگھ کے مقدمے میں قائداعظم نے کہا تھا کہ بھگت سنگھ کیس میں انصاف کے تقاضوں کو بالائے طاق رکھا گیا ہے۔ بھگت سنگھ ایک سیاسی قیدی ہے۔۔۔۔
انگریز سرکار نے بھگت سنگھ کو پھانسی دینے کے لیے ایک آرڈیننس کا سہارا لیتے ہوئےکمیشن بنایا۔۔۔
2011 میں بھارتی سپریم کورٹ نے  یہ فیصلہ دے کر کہ بھگت سنگھ کا مقدمہ کریمنل لاء کی بد ترین مثال تھا ۔۔۔قائداعظم کی تقلید کر دی۔۔۔۔ بھگت سنگھ کو 23 مارچ 1931 کو بہادر اور انصاف پسند انگریز  سرکار نے خفیہ طریقے سے پھانسی دے دی۔۔۔۔ مگر یہ پھانسی  برطانوی  راج کے نظامِ انصاف پر بدترین دھبہ ثابت ہوئی۔۔۔۔

بھگت سنگھ آج بھی زندہ ہے۔

In September 1929, Jinnah representing Bombay city in the Assembly, spoke powerfully, opposing this bill. Calling the trial a “farce” and a “travesty of justice”, he said that if the trial continued in the absence of the accused he “stands already condemned”. He also pointed out that Singh was a political prisoner and how the government was making a mistake by treating him a common criminal.
“Well, you know perfectly well that these men are determined to die. It is not a joke. I ask the honourable law member to realise that it is not everybody who can go on starving himself to death. Try it for a little while and you will see…. The man who goes on hunger strike has a soul. He is moved by that soul and he believes in the justice of his cause; he is not an ordinary criminal who is guilty of cold-blooded, sordid, wicked crime.”
The next day, Jinnah, the highest-paid lawyer in India at the time, took the Raj to task on the legality of Singh’s trial:
“It seems to me, Sir, that the great and fundamental doctrine of British jurisprudence, which is incorporated and codified in the Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code has very wisely not made such an absurd provision in the criminal law of this country and I am not satisfied that there is a lacuna in our system of criminal law.”
The outrage over the show trial of Singh made the Assembly reject this bill. This rejection by a puppet Assembly didn’t really mean much in actual terms though. The British Indian government simply ignored the House and introduced the amendment as an ordinance.

Judicial murder

Bhagat Singh researcher AG Noorani described the legal farce that followed after this:
“Having lost in the Assembly, the governor-general promulgated an ordinance, which was not subject to approval by the Assembly and expired after six months. It set up a tribunal to try the case. The entire trial was vitiated by flaws. A member of the tribunal, Justice Syed Agha Haider, was removed from the tribunal because, unlike the two European judges, he questioned the witnesses closely and repeatedly dissociated himself in writing from their orders. The tribunal which pronounced death sentences on the accused was itself under a sentence of death. The judges lost their office after six months. The accused were largely unrepresented by counsel and there was no right of appeal. The high court bar association set up a committee to consider the validity of the ordinance. Its report on June 19, 1930, found it to be 'invalid'.”
Bhagat Singh was secretly hanged on March 23, 1931 in Lahore. In 2011, the Supreme Court of India, echoing Jinnah, said that Singh’s trial was “contrary to the fundamental doctrine of criminal jurisprudence” since there was no opportunity for the accused to defend themselves.
Some links

A video 


Saturday, September 21, 2019

Radio Show about Afzal Ahsan Randhawa @ his 2nd death anniversary. (Read & Listen)

Radio Show about Afzal Ahsan Randhawa

@ his 2nd death anniversary. (Read & Listen)



In MastFM103 regular Friday show Lok Lhar a program was broadcast in memory of legendary Punjabi poet, writer, literary figure & translator Afzal Ahsan Randhawa recorded at Lhore station dated 20th September 2019.  In this program famous writer Mustansar Husan Tarar, President Punjabi Adbi Board Mushtaq Sufi, senior Punjabi short story writer Zubair Ahmad and Phd scholar & Lecturer of history Tohid Ahmad Chattha shared their views about Randhawa and his work. 


Listen complete recording of the Show, Click the link below

For biographical sketch, click and read link below
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afzal_Ahsan_Randhawa




گل بات: مستنصر حسین تارڑ، مشتاق صوفی، زبیر احمد ، توحید احمد چٹھہ اتے عامر ریاض۔


زبیر احمد۔ 47 دے بعد ساڈے پاسے پنجابی وچ  کہانیاں، ناول لکھن دا کم افصل احسن رندھاوا ہوراں شروع 
کیتا۔

مستنصر حسین تارڑ: میری رندھاوے نال ملاقات اوس ویلے دی ہے جداں اوہ ایم این اے سی۔ پنجابی  فکشن 

وچ اوہ سب توں وڈا ناں ہے۔اوس دی زبان بڑی سالڈ سی۔پنجاب دی پینڈو  اتے شہری رہتل تےاوس  نوں 

کمانڈ سی۔

مشتاق صوفی: اوہ جداں لہور آندے تے سنگت دے اکٹھ وچ اکثر آ جاندے سن۔

توحید چٹھہ: پنجاب دی ونڈ دا انہاں نوں ڈھیر رنج سی۔  پنجابی سلیکھ میلے وچ انہاں اگے ودھ کے ساڈا ساتھ دتا۔

پہلے ستمبر 1937 وچ امرتسر جمے افضل احسن رندھاوا 18 ستمبر 2017 وچ  پورے ہوئے سن اتے انہاں دی

 دوجی برسی تے مست ایف ایم 103 دے ہر جمعے ہون والے پروگرام لوک لہر وچ انہاں نوں یاد کیتا گیا۔ تسی

 ہن آپ ایس پروگرام نوں سنو۔





A piece in Dawn on his death


A piece in Pakistan Today on his departure


An old interview of Afzal Husain Randhawa

Another Interview of AHR along with his poetry. He shared his historic poem Nawan Ghallo Ghara , a poem about 1984, the 2nd JalianwalaBagh


A program about Ahmad Rahi


Thursday, September 19, 2019

Remembering Ahmad Rahi ( A radio Show at Lok Lhar)

Remembering Ahmad Rahi 

A radio show recorded at mastfm103 in memory of great Punjabi editor, poet and political worker born in Amritsar at 2 November 1923 and died in Lahore at September 2, 2002. At his 17th death year we did a program at September 6th 2019. 
Guests: Khalid Mansor, Nain Sukh, Tahir Asghar and Abdur Rauf Malik 

You may find his autobiographical details at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Rahi





Complete recording of the show.



Flap of Punjabi poetry book Tranjan written by Sadat Hasan Manto in 1952 reproduced in Abdur Rauf Malik's book Surkh Salam published by Jamhori Publications Lhore. 


Some useful links of Ahmad Rahi for further knowledge.

Book Tarinjan

http://apnaorg.com/books/trinjan/trinjan.php?fldr=book

Songs of Rahi the great
http://www.dareechah.com/modern_punjabi_poetry/ahmad_rahi_song_videos

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Without respecting diversity, no democracy can flourish. ( A radio discussion)


Without respecting diversity, no democracy can flourish. 
( A radio discussion) 


Respect of diversity is among the basic pillars of democracy yet in South Asia in particular it is largely missing since colonial times till today. Interestingly after emergence of Trump, Li Pin type white supremacy syndrome respect for diversity is facing serious challenges even in so-called advance world.  Just to understand ground realities we did a radio discussion in weekly Lok Lhar show (Every Friday from 2 to 4) on this topic. 
It was recorded in  Lhore studios 30th August 2019 at MastFM103.





Issues of not respecting diversity in Pakistan. 
Guests: Rashida Qureshi , Rizwan Butt, Gurmeet Singh & Azam Malik. 
Rashida Qureshi works with Search for Justice. She did M A economics from BZU Multan. 
Rizwan Butt a businessman, from Darugh e wala, Lhore. A social worker and ex-vice chairman UC 134.
Gurmeet Singh FirstSikh broadcaster in FM radios of Pakistan. Works with electronic media and promoter of Tourism in Pakistan.
Azam Malik a publisher, worked in developmental sector and secretary of Punjabi Sangat Pakistan.

Link of the complete radio show



Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Rise & Fall of democracies and Sino-American conflict in post cold war era. Can Trump handle it?



Rise & Fall of democracies and Sino-American conflict in post cold war era.

Can Trump handle it? 

What Trump is doing is not a new thing but it is continuation of an old policy in different packing. ٰIs democracy still a main deterrence  against anti-people aggression? Misuse of campaigns for Rights & democracy are on cards. Love with Hong Kong but silence on Kashmir, Palestine or vice versa is enough to understand gimmicks of power play.    
In his book (Published in 1992) American out of box thinker Noam Chomsky had revealed that future US rulers would be more brutal then their predecessors and would use hammer extensively to control the disturbed balance  of post cold war crisis. 
Although Chomsky was more clear on cold war mantra, designed in post WW2 era to protect US interests and deconstructed so-called ideological camp theory well yet his analysis of US ruling elite threw ample light on future. Even after 28 years, it is more close to reality in many ways. He wrote that the United States has deliberately fought against democratic, progressive movements in order to pursue its coercive, capitalist interests. 
At that time China was in making yet deterioration of USSR was on cards. Like early 1950s & late 1960s, UK unsuccessfully tried to use it in favor of her but finally compelled to play the role of subservient agent under US WOT. 
  
In a review of Chomsky's book writer had explained US interests as,
'' Noam Chomsky's latest book, Deterring Democracy, is an exhaustively researched , impassioned and reasoned analysis of American foreign policy. It defies dismissal. Chomsky argues that the United States historically has pursued "stability" instead of "democracy" overseas while claiming to pursue both. These two pursuits, Chomsky asserts, are incompatible because democratic history is an unstable terrain, a dialectical process wherein laboring classes (peasants, urban proletarians, trade unions) struggle against repressive regimes (corporate, military and political elites). In the midst of these inevitable conflicts and in an age ofcapital-intensive modernization, urbanization and surplus labor, twentiethcentury American foreign policy has been made. The U.S. Government, Chomsky persuasively argues, is ruled—albeit democratically—by a politico-corporate elite that has consistently sided with repressive regimes in the developing world, whose "assigned 'function' . . . has been to serve the needs of the industrial West." American business elites have demanded access to overseas markets, cheap labor and primary resources which repressive governments have been willing to exploit for a price. That price has been American financial, military and diplomatic support for regimes which in turn stifle democratic reform movements through violence, coercion, death-squad killings and widespread jailings. Chomsky further suggests that the United States has perpetuated an ideological system that masks these practices because they are morally reprehensible . The press, he shows, serves the corporate-governmental elite by defending and disguising U.S. Governmental hostility towards the political and economic freedom of laboring classes throughout the world. Chomsky addresses in detail the press's ideological commitment to the state's exceptionalism and "democratic mission." Chomsky establishes, therefore, that the United States has deliberately fought against democratic, progressive movements in order to pursue its coercive, capitalist interests''

If you analysis post 1990 Pakistan you may easily find implementation of US interests against democracy by the non-elected elite well. Not a single government or political party could review Pak-US relations. US role expanded in South Asia in post 9/11 era and in his book ON China Henry Kissinger threw ample light on it. Re-emergence of China Containment policy  expanded ample spaces for the elite of India & Bangladesh to save their petty interests. uring 1990s, the mantra of Offshore investments was coined to strangle Non-British & Non-US elite and it is serving well even in 2019. The mantra was, '' if you can control elite, you can influence deep states''. One may check rise of anti money laundering gods in this perspective too. But these arrangements were not enough to control things so civil rights campaigns and democracy got ample space in US foreign policy agenda to combat others.
To be continue






Punjab & Iqbal

وسیب تے وسنیک علامہ اقبال تے پنجاب عامر ریاض پنجاب تے پنجابی اوہ دو اکھاں جے جس پاروں اساں پنجابی عوام، پنجاب دے وسنیکاں اتے پنجابی وس...