16th December 1971: دسمبر کا جھٹکا
حد تو یہ ہے کہ 1970 کے انتخابات سے قبل مولانا بھاشانی کو انتخابات کا بائیکاٹ کرنے پر کس نے مجبور کیا تھا؟
مولانا بھاشانی مجیب الرحمن کے برعکس مشرقی و مغربی پاکستان دونوں میں انتخابات لڑ رہے تھے۔ جو کچھ 1971 کے فوجی آپریشن کے دوران ہوا اس بارے حمودالرحمن رپورٹ اور کے کے عزیز کی کتاب اہم ترین دستاویزات ہیں۔
بیگم عزیز کے بقول اس رپورٹ کی دستاویزات 39 ڈبوں میں محفوظ تھیں جنھیں کے کے عزیز کو پڑھنے اور ایک کتاب لکھنے کا حکم بھٹو صاحب نے دیا تھا۔ مگر وہ کتاب قدرت اللہ شہاب کی وجہ سے کبھی نہ چھپ سکی۔ بیگم صاحبہ کا مضمون بائیں بازوں کے رسالے عوامی جمہوری فورم نے اپنے شمارہ نمبر 49 میں چھاپا تھا۔
Mohit Sen was a West Bengali
comrade and regarding 16th December events he recorded what was
happening between Bharat, Pakistan and Moscow during those days. His autobiographical
account “A Traveler & the road” published by Rupa, 2003 is not only non formal
history of so-called revolutionary CPI but also a record of many important
events including1. Why Communists failed in India and Congress ,
Muslim League like parties got people’s attention, in 1930s and 1940s
2. Why Indian communists oppose quit india movement
and its impacts
3. After becoming part of planned war (cold war
between USSR & USA) how Russian state deviated. In 1943, Russians broke
third international and founded Com-in-Form in which Marxism was subservient to
Russian nationalism
4. Why sajjad zahier was engaged with All India
Muslim league and opposed not only S.C.Bose but also supported British war efforts
from 1942-46
5. How smartly Moscow side lined P.C.Joshi in early
1940s who was a diehard pro-congress communist and not ready to linked with New
Line. So Moscow supported Randhivay and then in 1952, Moscow again supported P
C Joshi and acted against Randhivay.
6. Defeat id India or bharat by China in 1961 war
7. Russian Chinese conflict and sectarianism among
Indian communists on the basis of pro-china and pro-USSR
8. Divided role of USSR polite Buru regarding
India-USSR pact and support of Indian Army intervention in East Pakistan during
early 1971. USSR foreign minister Andree Gromyko said if we did the pact then
it would be taken as our involvement in the breakage of Pakistan and then in
reaction Pakistan would go negative and in nutshell the whole region would move
to destruction. Yet Berzinive and Kosygin
were in favour of the pact.
Although
there is an ample room for disagreement with Sen yet he recorded many things
too. It is a must book for South asian comrades to read. Thanks to Ajoy Roy, a
communist from East Pakistan whom I met in Bengladesh in 2009. I published his
interview in Awami Jamhori forum available online too. He gave me the gift of
that book after knowing my critical views regarding left parties or leaders."Sen was born into a progressive and westernized Brahmo Samaj family. His father, Justice Amarendra Nath Sen, was a judge of
the Calcutta High Court and his mother, Mrinalini Sen (née Sinha), was an
eminent dancer. His paternal grandfather was an Advocate General of Burma. His
maternal grandfather was Major N.P. Sinha, a member of the Indian Medical
Service and his
mother's elder uncle was Lord Satyendra Prasanno
Sinha, the first Indian Governor of Bihar. On his mother's
side he came from the zamindari family of Raipur in Birbhum, a district in
present day West Bengal. While in Cambridge, in 1948, he
joined the Communist Party of
India (CPI) as a
'candidate-member'. Also in Cambridge he met and married Vanaja Iyengar, who became an
eminent mathematician later, in 1950. After marriage the couple moved to the People’s Republic of
China. Sen went to theChina International Communist School in Beijing between 1950 to 1953.
After his return to India, Mohit Sen worked in the CPI central office in New Delhi and also for its publishing house during 1953-62. Later he
became party organizer and teacher in Andhra Pradesh.
Until this year (1955) the Communist Party was saying that Indian people were not independent; they even opposed our National Day celebrations.... They also said that when they were in doubt about the right line of action, they had to get directions from the Soviet Union. Early in 1951-52, some principal leaders of the Communist Party went to Moscow secretly, that is without passports. They came back and said that they had got directions from Mr. Joseph Stalin. At least this is what they said. The line then laid down was one of full opposition (to the Government) and, where possible, petty insurrections."Regarding 16th December two documents are very important, one is Humdur Rehman Report (Orignal) 39 boxes and other is late K k Aziz book unpublished due to Qudrat ullah shahab. Begum K K aziz recorded that story in an article I published in AJForum also available online.
Until this year (1955) the Communist Party was saying that Indian people were not independent; they even opposed our National Day celebrations.... They also said that when they were in doubt about the right line of action, they had to get directions from the Soviet Union. Early in 1951-52, some principal leaders of the Communist Party went to Moscow secretly, that is without passports. They came back and said that they had got directions from Mr. Joseph Stalin. At least this is what they said. The line then laid down was one of full opposition (to the Government) and, where possible, petty insurrections."Regarding 16th December two documents are very important, one is Humdur Rehman Report (Orignal) 39 boxes and other is late K k Aziz book unpublished due to Qudrat ullah shahab. Begum K K aziz recorded that story in an article I published in AJForum also available online.
Correction
in the article
Mohit sen
recorded a fact about some socialist countries that did not support Indian army
intervention and these were Yugoslavia, Vietnam and Romania yet in the urdu
dawn article, by mistake some wrong names are published
Now u can
read the two page story at
-----------------
دلچسپ تضاد یہ ہے کہ جو 1947 والی تقسیم کے خلاف تھے وہ آج نئی تقسیم میں حصہ دار تھے جبکہ جنھیں 1947 کی تقسیم بھاتی تھی وہ آج ناخوش تھے۔ ہندوستانی و پاکستانی قوم پرستوں نے ان دونوں تقسیموں کے بعد "باہر والوں" پر الزام لگا کر اپنی جان چھڑانے پر اکتفا کو "قومی مفاد" قرار دیا۔
1947 کی تقسیم کے بعد ہندوستانی قوم پرستوں نے اقبال و جناح اور انگریزوں پر سارا "ملبہ" ڈالنا ضروری گردانا تو 1971 کے بعد مغربی پاکستان کے جیالوں نے مجیب الرحمن اور ہندوستانی و روسی لابی ہی کو اس کارستانی کا محرک قرار دے کر تبرا کیا۔
'باہر والوں' کو مجرم قرار دے کر اپنا رانجھا راضی کرنا وہ روایت ہے جسے عرف عام میں 'بلی کو دیکھ کر کبوتر کا آنکھیں بند کرنا' سے مماثلث دی جا سکتی ہے۔
--------------------
1971 کے دنوں میں موہیت سین سینئر کامریڈ راجیشور راﺅ کے نزدیک تھے۔ یہ وہی راجیشور راﺅ تھے جو سویت پولٹ بیورو، اندرا گاندھی اور سی پی آئی کے درمیان رابطے کا کام بھی کرتے تھے۔ راجیشور راﺅ کے حوالے سے اپنی کتاب کے صفحہ 312 سے 320 کے درمیان 16 دسمبر کی کہانی لکھی ہے جو یہ پتہ دیتی ہے کہ ہندوستان سے معاہدہ کرنے اور مشرقی بنگالیوں کو ہندوستانی مدد دینے کے حوالہ سے روسی پولیٹ بیورو بھی منقسم تھی۔
وہ کامریڈ جو اس 'معاہدہ و مدد' کو غلط قدم سمجھتے تھے ان کی قیادت کوئی اور نہیں بلکہ روسی وزیرخارجہ آندرے گرومیکو کر رہے تھے۔ موہیت سین کے بقول گرومیکو سمجھتے تھے اس معاہدہ کا مطلب 'پاکستان توڑنے' میں روسی مدد ہی لیا جائے گا اور اس سے پاکستان میں نہ صرف ردعمل بڑھے گا بلکہ خطے کا امن بھی برباد ہو جائے گا۔ وہ مشرقی پاکستان کے بنگالیوں کی اخلاقی مدد کے حق میں تھے۔ البتہ روسی وزیراعظم کوسجن اور جنرل سیکرٹری بریژنیف کو گرومیکو سے اختلاف تھا اور یوں گرومیکو کی بات نہ مانی گئی۔ ایسے ہی ویت نام، چیکو سلواکیہ اور بلغاریہ سے سمجھتے تھے کہ ہندوستانی فوجوں کو کسی بھی صورت بین الاقوامی سرحد کو عبور نہیں کرنا چاہیے۔
No comments:
Post a Comment