Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Rise of People's politics and JillianWalla incident 1919 in the Punjab


Rise of People's politics and JillianWalla incident 1919

in the Punjab

We often miss some points while analyzing some important events. While writing about JillianWalla Bagh incident, same happens either in pride or prejudice. In fact, it was an event which recorded mass reaction started from the Punjab yet everyone listen its resonance in whole subcontinent. Either you like Khilafat movement or non cooperation movement yet it is a fact that those movements got importance after the mass level protest on JiilianWalla Bagh incident. The pressure continued in consistent provincial elections held between 1921-29 from Bengal to the Punjab. Just read how JillianWalla incident influenced our politics



Rebuttal of I A Rehman's review published in book & author regarding Jamal Naqvi book


Leaving the Left Behind

Rebuttal of I A Rehman's review published in book & author

letter to editor Dawn 30 April 2014

I READ I.A. Rahman`s review (April 13) of Jamal Nagvi`s book, Leaving the Left Behind with great interest since I had already gone through the book.

The review, honestly, came as a rude shock as it was hard to understand if Rahman was being sarcastic, and, if yes, over what? There were half-formed implications about both the book and Naqvi. The factual inaccuracy committed at the very beginning was itself the most off-putting element in the review.

When Naqvi was having to take the decisions by himself, Nazeer Abbasi was still alive albeit in hiding. They were both arrested on the same day (July 30, 1980; Page 82) where Abbasi died and Naqvi came out several years later. While undergoing almost a year-long solitary confinement, there was no way Naqvi could have been running party affairs, as has been suggested by Rahman (para 5).

Besides, the decisions Rahman has cited relate to Nagvi`s post-release period (1986).

To create a misplaced image in the minds of the readers who have not gone through the book yet can hardly be called fair comment.

Finally, both the text of the review and the technical details listed at the end of it have put the book in the category of `History` which it surely is not. It is a memoir, a subjective view of how the protagonist saw it happening, not a rigorous piece of history or a theoretical criticism of the doctrine.

Rahman, the senior writer and intellectual that he is, could have surely done better than the current effort which often sounds below the belt without letting the readers know the reason behind his uncharacteristic scorn.

Dr Syed Talha Iqbal Karachi.
I A rehman's article can be read at
http://pakedu.net/e-books/leaving-the-left-behind-history-by-syed-jamaluddin-naqvi-with-humair-ishtiaq-pakistan-study-centre-karachi-isbn-978-969-8467-56-2/

Monday, April 28, 2014

Press freedom, Commercial interests and Stigmas From May 1949 to May 2014


Press freedom, Commercial interests and Stigmas

From May 1949 to May 2014

A case of the death of a Lhore based oldest & popular Newspaper Civil & Military Gazette

It is a stigma
1.       For the State of Pakistan
2.       For the Government of Liaqat Ali Khan
3.       For more than 15 editors of Media Groups who signed a joint editorial against C&MG to fulfilled their commercial interest
.

Out of 15 media groups Mian Iftiqar u din of Pakistan Times had to face same fate during 1960s while Jang is ready to face now. Is it high time for media owners, Government, Political parties and journalists to rethink about it. Ironically the incident was happened in the month of May 65 years back yet it is quoted againest Pakistan in every new research paper extensively. are we ready to learn lesson from it? Cannot we avoid such stigmas? just rethink for once

 List of Newspapers



No
Newspaper
Editor
No
Newspaper
Editor
01
DAWN
Altaf Hussain
09
Naw e Waqat
Majid Nizami
02
Dawn (Gujrati)
Noor Muhammad Jamal Noor Maimon
10
Inqalab
Mehar & Salik
03
Dawn (Urdu)
Fazal Ahmad Sadique
11
Al Waheed (Sindhi)
Abdul Ghafor Siastai
04
Jang
Mir Khalil ur Rahman
12
Zamindar
Akhtar Ali Khan
05
Anjam
Ommar Farooq
13
Safina
Waqar Ubmalvi
06
Sindh Observor
Pir Ali Muhammad Rashdi
14
Ghalib
Mir Noor Muhammad
07
Pakistan Times
Faiz Ahmad Faiz
15
Maghrabi Pakistan
Khalil Ahmad
08
Imroz*
Chiragh Hassan Hasrat
16
Jadeed Nizam
Amin ud din Sahrai

·         Hasrat resisted it for 24 hours yet next day at May 7, 1949 he had to publish it.

Instead of that West Punjab Union of Journalists (later PUJ) and Sindh Union of Journalists (later Karachi union of Journalists) never endorsed it.  The conflict was due to published news in C & MG yet next day newspaper had apologized at same pages. But it was not an issue but some competitor media owners wanted to kill CMG at all cost. For this they used patriotism as usual.
The story is attached as written by Zamir Niazi in his famous book Press in Chains. Read it



URDU TEXT OF ZAMIR NIAZI BOOK ABOUR CMG













Saturday, April 26, 2014

Why Pakistan is in trouble waters consistently?





Why Pakistan is in trouble waters consistently?

From last 6 months we are reading different news in international & national press regarding Pakistan. Somehow after every 3 to 4 weeks, a new issue comes and it often replaced by another one in next few days. Sometimes it originates from international scene but many times it originates from home ground. Recent one is Hamid Mir issue and we have witnessed why many local player under commercial & political interests have curiosity to make it alive at any cost. Some even tries hard to link it with ever critical and sensitive issue of civil military relations. Some wants to use it against competitor media while some wants to use it against elected government either by creating gulfs between army and media or media or civilian government or army and elected government. In playing these games, they have no interest what’s the impact it has especially in international scene and on the public at large within Pakistan. Thanks to Genral Pervaiz Musharaf , sheikh rasheed like people that we have a OUT of Regulation media. A senior official in information ministry told that at least ministry had given its summary in favor of cross media censorship thrice yet Minister Sheikh Rasheed convinced his boss that it would give him legitimacy at international front.  So those who are criticizing media only in this debate must include Musharaff and Rasheed first. The recent fight is neither in the interest of conflicting institutions nor will it attract public at large. One is hiding behind freedom of press and other is hiding behind patriotism yet both have a record of reservations against elected tier.
Just compare this fight with 1980s when media, courts, rightist religious lobby and civil military bureaucracy were one against political players. Even international power players were there to protect that unholly allience. After 25 years, scenario is much different. In good old days same conflicting parties were busy in defaming political parties one way or other. Both used the stigmas like “security risk” or “traitor” against Shaheed Benazir Bhutto without any proof. Did they ever raise such issues like freedom of the press or patriotism at that stage?  But now both parties are presenting them in totally different style. It’s better if both accepted old follies and moves toward a New social Contract as soon as possible. If both agree then elected tier can play a vital role in normalization.  There are hawks who want to raise the conflict to fulfill their petty interests yet in this particular scenario it will not only harm both conflicting institutions but also add negative popularity of the country.
It is post 9/11 world, courts are playing independently and there are fractions among religious rightist lobby and new electronic media is their without regulations. Press clubs are not strong enough; Wage Board is out of question and everyone inside the country and outside it is ready to purchase media space. Instead of making house in order, competitor media is just playing on the name of patriotism.
Election results of India and Afghanistan are on cards. The worst scenario is victory of two odds i-e Moodi & Abdulah Abdullah But if we apply political arithmetic we can convert this challenge into opportunity.  House in order is the first condition yet ability to deal with odds will help us in finding out of box solutions.


After first democratic transition in last 65 years, Pakistan has popular governments not only in federation but also in provinces. There is not any threat to any government either in center or province which is a rare development. All the three ruling parties have lot many common thoughts on vital issues including non-intervention in neighboring countries.  There is a debate on handling non state actors yet no one is ready to leave the solutions onto terrorists. Pakistan is engaging world day by day economically and if such situation continues, Pakistan can save guard its geo-political interests but if our house will not in order then we will miss a chance once again. 

Monday, April 21, 2014

Problems of Pakistani liberals & connections



Problems of Pakistani liberals & connections
 اوہ ایہہ کھرا اج دیہاڑ تیک نہیں کڈھ سکے پئی جنج پادشاہ، پادشاہ ہی ہوندا ہے اینج ہی ’’ڈکٹیٹر‘‘ وی ڈکٹیٹر ہی ہوندا ہے بھانویں اوہ لبرل ہوئے اسلامی۔ ایس دا دین ایمان آپدی ’’غیر آئینی‘‘ سرکار نوں تحفظ دینا ہی رہندا ہے اتے باقی سب رام کہانیاں ہوندیاں نیں۔

We have some unique ideologues & experts in Pakistan. In education they are against Pakistani mother tongues while in politics they love to find enlightened and moderate civil military bureaucrats against elected representatives.  Musharaaf is their recent love yet they have a long legacy in this regard. Some of them enriched us regarding secular and just administration of British India too. In their analysis General Ayub was also secular and some of them even supported secular NAP who chose Mollana Mufti Mahmud as CM with the support of NAP majority members just to tease Bhutto.  Their support for PNA is also on record. King is always a King and similarly a dictator is always a dictator yet some liberals were smart enough who supported (some of them still supporting) Musharaff who was father of MMA. There are two incidents in which leaders of all Muslim minority sects made alliances, one was PNA and other was MMA and one was created by Zia while other was established with the strategic support of Musharaff. Just read , understand and enjoy 
جنج کڑی دے ریپ بعدوں تھانیدار شک دا گھما چلاندے ہوئے اتے کڑی دی کردار کشیاں کریندے ہوئے سب نوں کھجل کریندا ہے اینج ہی ایہہ سیانے آکھدے نیں جے مارشلا آیا تاں فیر ایہہ سیاستداناں دی غلطیاں پاروں ہی لگ سی۔ اوہ ایس دا الزام ’’تھانیدار‘‘ وانگ ’’مظلوماں‘‘ تے ہی دھرنا چاہیندے نیں

CLICK FOR READING COMPLETE ARTICLE HERE

Saturday, April 12, 2014

JillanWalla Bagh Massacre & Role of Rudyard Kipling, Mahatma Gandhi Vs Montagu, Iqbal, Jinnah, Tagore and Churchill


JillanWalla Bagh Massacre & Role of Rudyard Kipling, Mahatma Gandhi Vs Montagu,  Iqbal, Jinnah, Tagore and Churchill.

We have some over smart intellectuals among us these days. In pride and prejudices such intellectuals have often act in haste and its last example is a piece written by a person who had good reputation in past too. His rejection from PML (N) compelled him toward chaos and in reaction he is busy in exploring unusual ways. His latest exploration was regarding Allama Iqbal in which he criticized Iqbal for not writing a single verse on JillianWalla Bagh incident.
So at the 95th year of JillanWalla Bagh, here is a piece in which you will find statements/actions/verses of numerous political giants at that moment. It includes Nobel Laureate(1907) Rudyard Kipling , mahatma Gandhi, Allama Iqbal, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Nobel Laureate(1913) Rabinder Nath Tagore, Secretary of State in India  in 1919, Edwin Samuel Montagu and Secretary of State for War in 1919 Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill.
Everyone knew the details of that day and those who do not know can Google it easily yet it is difficult to gather statements so I just reproduced it from numerous sources.
Alex Van Tunzelmann’s famous book “Indian Summer: The Secret History of the End of an Empire” (2007) recorded Letter of mahatma Gandhi published in his magazine/newspaper “Harigen” after 5 days of the massacre. Alex used strong references like Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi Vol 15, pp 243-45 and Patrick French marvelous book Liberty or Death p-20. In Indian Summer at P43/44, while talking about Dyer’s massacre Mahatama declared that they “were definitely not heroic martyrs”   and criticized them for having “taken to their heels” rather than face death calmly”.
After the incident people reacted not only in the Punjab but also in whole subcontinent and even in London and Paris too. Due to the first mass reaction of its own kind in the history of British India, The Empire finally announced a commission.   Viceroy council was not happy with that decision hence On 14 October 1919, after orders issued by the Secretary of State for India, Edwin Montagu, the Government of India announced the formation of a committee of inquiry to "investigate the recent disturbances in Bombay, Delhi and Punjab. It was Hunter Commission, with 9 members, 6 Europeans and 3 locals. On 19 November, Dyer was called to appear before the Commission. Like Pervaiz Musharaf his supporters too had suggested he be represented by legal counsel at the inquiry yet under pressure he had to appear before the commission. Dyer was finally found guilty of a mistaken notion of duty and relieved of his command on 23 March. He had been recommended for a CBE as a result of his service in the Third Afghan War; this recommendation was cancelled on 29 March 1920.
Yet Dyer had supporters in London too. According to Alex House of Lords passed a motion in his support while The Morning Post newspaper started a drive to raise funds, 26000 pounds were collected from numerous people including Rudyard Kipling and Duke of Somerset yet in House of Commons Churchill and Montagu recorded fierce criticism on the act.  
Jinnah stood right as he had already spoken about such incidents before time at the enforcement of Rowlett Act. Jinnah had resigned from Legislative council at 18th march 1919, almost 25 days before the incident and said “The passing of the Rowlatt Bill..has severly shaken the trust repose by them in British justice……….the fundamental principle of justice have been uprooted…..i, therefore, as a protest against the passing of the bill and the manner in which it was passed, tender my resignation as member of the Imperial legislative council”. (Jinnah: as a Parliamentarian by Jaffar malik, I A Rahman and Ghani jaffar p-73)
Khilafat, hijrat and non-cooperation like movements were the result of such barbaric acts and those movements too ruined us from within.  
 Allama Iqbal’s verse regarding Jillanwalla Bagh is also reproduced from Khurram ali Shafique’s Book who is writing an unusual biography of Iqbal in 6 Volumes. In its 3rd Volume he reproduced a verse under the heading of JilianWalla bagh at Page 460 and it is included in the piece too. Iqbal also wrote a letter to his brother, included in same volume in which he criticized Khalifat movement.
Tagore was also among those visionaries who opposed it timely and he renounced his knighthood in protest against the inhuman cruelty of the British Government to the people of Punjab",English Writings of Rabindranath Tagore Miscellaneous Writings Vol# 8 carries a facsimile of this hand written letter.
So this is the state of affairs and now one can understand bankruptcy of our so-called intellectuals very well. Now Read the piece published today
 For clear view click here
http://e.dunya.com.pk/detail.php?date=2014-04-13&edition=LHR&id=1000527_42427232



Friday, April 11, 2014

In memory of Jamil Ommar News & photos



In memory of Jamil Ommar News & photos
Reports published in Daily Times, daily jang, Daily Khabrian, Daily Express, Naw e waqat, Daily City 42

Under Friends of jamil ummar a program was organized today at Hamdard Hall near Jain Mandar, LHORE in which diverse sections of his friends participated. Some important names were professor Zaffar Ali Khan, Liaqat AliFarooq TariqPervaizMajeed, I A Rahman, Aamir Riaz, Rana Abdur Rahman, Zahor Ahmad, Rao Tariq Latief, Professor Aziz u din Ahmad, Aleem Khan, Riaz danishwar, Shameem, Asma, Taufique, Shazia Khan, Khalid Mahood, Iqbal Haider Butt, Raja Walyat, Naeem Shakir, Amjad Ali Shakir, javed akhtar, Ahmad Waseem, islam ul Haq Hussain naqi, syeda Diep Saeeda, Rahem Ul Haq, Saif ur rahman, Javed Bhatti, Syed Qurban Raza, Abdul Haye baloch, hayder zaman, Pervaiz hood Bhai, Zahid Pervaiz, Qurban raza, Rana Shafiqur Rahman, , Malik Aslam, Kausar Malik, Zubair Ahmad, Zoya sajjid, Arfan Ch,Naved Pushkan and his family members.
The meeting was presided by Jamil's elder sister Nusrat Mubarak and Professor aziz u din ahmad and while conducting this meeting i could not smoke for three hours. as it was not any "one way traffic" program so almost 28 people in the gathering of more than 130 share their memories which includes not only his relatives & political friends but also those who have political differences with him. In past Awami Jamhori forum did such meetings regarding Sibt ul Hassan zeygum and Professor Khalid mahmood with same design. Hope friends will organize such interactive meetings too.


Daily Dunya April 16th 2014
For clear view click here
http://e.dunya.com.pk/detail.php?date=2014-04-16&edition=LHR&id=1006660_25533796




News published in Daily Express, Daily city 42, Khabrain, Naw e waqat, So far


Nawe waqat
http://www.nawaiwaqt.com.pk/E-Paper/lahore/2014-04-11/page-9

Daily Al-Sharaq Newspaper
Link http://www.dailyashsharq.com/components/com_spgm/spgm/gal/ASH-SHARQ%20Dubai/Page%2008.jpg



Daily Express April 11th 2014
http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1102155677&Issue=NP_LHE&Date=20140411


Daily Times

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/national/10-Apr-2014/prof-jamil-umar-remembered-friends-family-eulogise-comrade-s-commitment-efforts-for-unity

Daily Jang

http://e.jang.com.pk/04-12-2014/lahore/pic.asp?picname=08_04.jpg







Thanks for Toheed Malik Ans, a young relative of Jamil who made this degital record of photographs

















Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Autobiography of a Pakistani Communist: Jamal Naqvi "Leaving the Left behind"






Autobiography of a Pakistani Communist

Jamal Naqvi "Leaving the Left behind"

Now available@ READINGS, LHORE
book ur copy at
 www.readings.com.pk
and get discount

Although title speaks louder than the inside pages yet it must be a good reading for all. I am just sharing its table of contents and prologue so that u can smell the flavor at least. As i am too reading it so i cannot say that it will be as good and juicy as the autobiograpghy of an Indian communist Mohit Sain " A Traveller and the road" published by Rupa yet he is witness to many developments after 1957 at least.

Its Publisher is Pakistan Study Centre Karachi, Sindh. its adress is
Pakistan Study Centre, P.O. Box No.8450, University of Karachi
Karachi-75270 Sindh. Tel: 99261631; Fax: 99261632; Email: pscuok@yahoo.com



PROLOGUE
IT was dogma of another kind.
All my life till then I had been fighting against being dogmatic in approach towards life … every aspect of life, to be precise. And the tool in my hands to wage that war against dogmatism was my belief in the ideology of Communism. And the source of strength in times when things were not quite going right — and they had been not quite going right more often than not — was the practice of Communism in the erstwhile Soviet Union and the many countries under its influence that together marked the bipolar existence of political geography in the post World War II era. Simply put, I was on the other side of the 'Iron Curtain'. Whether the 'curtain' was hallowed or condemned, famous or infamous depended on how and from where one hap
pened to be looking at it. For me it was a case of the former rather than the latter on both counts … till then.
I was a Red, The reddest of the Red. So Red that even to my own surprise I had been part of the decision-making body of the Communist Party of Pakistan. Some would say that I was the decision-maker, but that was not quite right. Yes, when circumstances so demanded, I had to take a few decisions on my own,
but, generally speaking, I was part of the party structure having moved through the ranks to be part of the Politburo. I had never had the time to move away from Pakistan to have a peek into the world behind the Iron Curtain. Like millions elsewhere and thousands in Pakistan, I just assumed that anything and every
thing negative being said by anybody anywhere about Communism or its practice was nothing but mere propaganda — and most of it actually was indeed just that: propaganda. What I — like the millions elsewhere and thousands in Pakistan — failed to realize at the time was that we had ourselves fallen victim to
the propaganda being unleashed from behind the Iron Curtain. I can't vouch for the millions elsewhere and thousands in Pakistan, but I for one had surely fallen victim to that propaganda. That, I guess, is the price one has to pay for being too close to the events and for being too preoccupied with party politics. It generates a kind of myopia that one needs to guard against. I had failed to do that … till then.
Till 1990.Sitting in the plane that was taking me to Moscow, I had little idea of what to expect. The Afghan war was practically over. Mikhail Gorbachev's policies of Glasnost and Perestroika were sending out signals that were not easily decipherable for the world at large and, as such, there was no dearth of interpretations on that count. Personally speaking, I was not in a position to even have an intelligent guess. Of the preceding few years, I had spent six in prison on trumped-up charges of sedition brought against me and others by the military junta under General Ziaul Haq. Physically I had been in a bad shape having twice suffered strokes during that period which had led to episodes of transient paraly sis. It was all in the past now and I was about to land in Moscow, which had been the Mecca of Communism for as long as I could remember.
As I said, I had little idea of what to expect. But what I was not expecting in the least was the possibility of the trip being an eye-opener. It not only opened my eyes; it opened them wide. The workers of the world may have united, but for every chain they had lost in the process, they had been forced to carry two more. After over 70 years of full-scale practice of Communism, the disparity in Soviet society was worse than I had ever seen in Pakistan. It was disillusionment of the highest and the most unexpected order. I had been invited to spend a few months there — probably as a compensation for the imprisonment I had suffered for leading the Communist Party of Pakistan — but so frus trated and annoyed I had felt by what I had seen there in practice that I returned after just a fortnight.
Had I wasted my life fighting for Communism? I urgently needed to find an answer to that question which was stroking my mind with ascending force. In theory, the system was against any kind of corruption, against any kind of dogma, promoted intel lectual stimulation, and targeted equality at every level. In practice, I had seen it doing just the opposite. For the first time I felt the weight of the Iron Curtain on my soul. It was crushing. And, indeed, it was very, very disillusioning. I needed to think it through and see if I was over-reacting. During my time in prison, the Communist Party of Pakistan had also moved on — nudged along by some state and non-state actors — and I was no more part of its core leadership. I was more of an elder statesman than a politician. This allowed me the liberty to take a detached view of what my life had been, and to have a rational view of what I had seen in what used to be the Soviet Union. At the end of the process, two things were crystal clear to me: one, that in fighting against dogma, I had been gripped by dogma of another kind; and, two, mine was a life wasted. There was no point in discussing the thoughts with many as they preferred to live in the old world charm of being part of the haunted, persecuted Red. But if one thing I had learned with clarity from my days — years and years, actually — as a student and follower of Communism, it was the fundamentality of being Progressive. I publicly conceded that I was wrong in rather unwittingly practicing a dogma in the name of keeping dogma at bay.

As could be expected, the reaction, to put it mildly, was not positive. But that mattered little. I was honest to myself and, come to think of it, I was honest to the core value of Communism which wanted people to be Progressive. I had moved on, and I have never looked back since. The story that follows is the story of a life mostly spent chasing shadows … an utter waste.

Followers of Zia's language Policy & literature festivals ضیاالحق دے لسانی سجن اتے ادبی کانفرنساں

  Followers of Zia's language Policy & literature festivals It was dictator Zia ul Hoq who not only played sectarian card but also d...