Saturday, December 16, 2023

Why Skill based general education is essential in Pakistan? Rethinking

 


Why Skill based general education is essential in Pakistan? Rethinking

ہنر نال جڑی تعلیم پاروں ہی پاکستان وچ جنرل ایجوکیشن مارکیٹ تے معاشرے لئی فیدے دے سکدی ہے اتے سکولاں وچ بچے جاون دی گنتری وی وادھو ہو سکدی جے۔


A Punjabi radio program LOK LHAR recorded at MastFM103, Lhore December 11, 2023

Participants : Samya Pervaiz, Moghiz Khan & Moasa Shahbaz 

Since colonial times, our general education was based on learning writing skills only because colonial administration need claraks, know as Babu, for office work. Other than writing skills, all knowledge production was theoretical largely, it had no link with market as well as society. Till 1947, we had very less schools as well as students , majority of schools, colleges were in the Punjab only but even in the Punjab school were not in big number. After 1947 school ratio increased but after nationalization public education increased a lot. Post Zia period witnessed huge expansion in private education but it was without regulation. Today more than 50 million students are in schools, collages and universities but school education failed to delink it from colonial legacy. A matriculated student is of no use of market or the society. let us listen the discussion 

A video clip of the program

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCeFAO7Sg40



Mosa sharing his experience 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HlxxC9dIoO8



Listen the program  recorded at MastFM103, Lhore Dec 11, 2023

https://voca.ro/17bylU2ejaVn


Further links regarding Skill base education

2013...Those who have read the 1946 report of "post war plan " or voluminous report of 2nd Education conference of 1951, can easily understand the importance of Skill education. Some times people treat it as an separate entity but it is essential to link it with general education

Iqbal Response to Skill base Education & Education for Muslims

2015....Curriculum of Hate or Peace

Linking Education with Job Market via skill education

2018.... Our Flawed Education Systems & misleading narratives: What to do?



Saturday, December 9, 2023

Climate disaster, Global priorities & its impact on Women & Children in Pakistan

 



Climate disaster, Global priorities & its impact on Women & Children in Pakistan  


Guests Abdul Khaliq Social researcher & Activist ...... Asma Aamir Project Manager WISE, 


In my area, the British Punjab, colonialism and Climate disaster encompassed our lives since 29th March 1849 and that disastrous legacy increased manifold especially after 1947 in the last 76 years in various forms, thanks to colonial as well as post colonial anti-people development models. As we are suffering from it since 174 years so a state of denial regarding climate disaster by our elite is understandable. 

From so-called Industrial revolutions to digital revolution, now the big world is proactive regarding the climate justice but like post 9/11 scholarship, it is hard for them to accept their flawed priorities. 

Today when I am writing this blog, news regarding killings of people in #Gaza & around reminding us that it is high time for UN General Assembly to amend UN laws and play its role not also against political but also climate disasters. 

Its not our first radio program, we always prioritize issues like Human Rights, Gender issues, Education, Climate Change, democracy, Press Freedom etc 



موسماں وچ اتھل پتھل، عالمی پردھاناں دی ترجیحاں،ساڈی 

انکاری باتاں اتے زنانیاں تے بچیاں تے ایس دا بھار۔

 

جے بچ سکو تے بچ جاو


 خالق شاہ تے عصمہ عامر نال گل بات


Asma sharing her views (Video)



Social Researcher Abdul Khaliq in action (Video) 




ہن سنو پورا پروگرام، تھلے کلک کر سو تے سن سو









Few old links regarding Climate Change & Climate Disaster




 


Sunday, December 3, 2023

Partitions, Economics, Colonialism & it continuation

 




Partitions, Economics, Colonialism & it continuation 

Partitions & Oil economy encompassed the 20th century from its early decades yet court historians, clever intellectuals & Western media often misguided it due to obvious reasons. What happened during last three decades of 19th century set the agenda yet it was largely implemented during two European conflicts, infamously popularized by media & court historians as WW1 & WW2. Its high time to revisit history of 20th century so that we can easily understand power of  electronic commerce, Climate Change & porous border games well. 





The McMahon Line is the boundary between China , Burma with British India imposed by UK. 1914

Durand Line The western end runs to the border with Iran and the eastern end to the border with China. 1895


Just imagine, how both lines disturbed old silk route & destroy the land trade links. These bloody lines were further strengthened in 1947 when the divided Bengal & the Punjab. 

Creation of Jewish land in Palestine was designed to control not only Sea trade route but also to control Oil rich lands but it was projected as Jew vs Muslim conflict. In his book (written 1940) PAKISTAN: OR THE PARTITION OF INDIA, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar relate it with Palestine issue. Just readit 

[Will Punjabis and Bengalis agree to redraw their boundaries?]

    One last question and this discussion of Pakistan in relation to communal peace may be brought to a close. Will the Hindus and the Muslims of the Punjab and Bengal agree to redraw the boundaries of their provinces to make the scheme of Pakistan as flawless as it can be made?

    As for the Muslims, they ought to have no objection to redrawing the boundaries. If they do object, it must be said that they do not understand the nature of theirown demand. This is quite possible, since the talk that is going on among Muslim protagonists of Pakistan, is of a very loose character. Some speak of Pakistan as a Muslim National State, others speak of it as a Muslim National Home. Neither care to know whether there is any difference between a National State and a National Home. But there can be no doubt that there is a vital difference between the two. What that difference is was discussed at great length at the time of constituting in Palestine a Jewish National Home. It seems that a clear conception of what this difference is, is necessary, if the likely Muslim opposition to the redrawing of the boundaries is to be overcome.

    According to a leading authority :—

"A National Home connotes a territory in which a people, without receiving the rights of political sovereignty, has nevertheless a recognised legal position and receives the opportunity of developing its moral, social and intellectual ideals."

    The British Government itself, in its statement on Palestine policy issued in 1922, defined its conception of the National Home in the following terms :—

"When it is asked what is meant by the development of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the imposition of a Jewish nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine as a whole, but the further development of the existing Jewish Community, with the assistance of Jews in other parts of the world, in order that it may become a centre in which the Jewish people as a whole may take, on grounds of religion and race, an interest and a pride. But in order that this community should have the best prospect of free development and provide a full opportunity for the Jewish people to display its capacities, it is essential that it should be known that it is in Palestine as of right and not on sufferance. This is the reason why it is necessary that the existence of a Jewish National Home in Palestine should be internationally guaranteed, and that it should be formally recognized to rest upon ancient historic connection."

https://franpritchett.com/00ambedkar/ambedkar_partition/index.html#contents 



After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, Britain was given administrative control over the area then known as Palestine. Britain’s foreign secretary at the time, Arthur James Balfour — who was previously Britain’s chief secretary for Ireland, and known for his sometimes brutal suppression of Irish demands for independence — had laid out his country’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” in the Balfour Declaration of 1917. A few years later, Britain granted independence to much of the island of Ireland but held on to the six counties that still make up Northern Ireland and remain part of the United Kingdom. That legislation provided the template for partitions in other former British colonies, including India and Pakistan in 1947, “and Israel and Palestine” the following year, said Dr. Ohlmeyer.......British officials have drawn their own parallels between the Irish and the Palestinians. Ronald Storrs, who was governor of Jerusalem from 1917 to 1926, wrote in his memoir that if enough Jewish people moved to Palestine, it could “form for England a ‘little loyal Jewish Ulster

in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism” — a reference to English settlers who were sent to Northern Ireland in what became known as the “plantation of Ulster.” #Newyorktimes 



Saturday, December 2, 2023

Lhore: Bhutto, Kissinger & Nuclear game in South Asia

 

 Lhore: Bhutto, Kissinger & Nuclear game in South Asia

Both India & Pakistan are nuclear States but both failed to use latest technology for them. Both are dependent on fuel from foreign suppliers. Why Indra Gandhi & Indian establishment opted for nuclear test in 1974? After 50 years we have to think about it.


This plant would process spent uranium rods from nuclear reactors to prepare them for re‐use as fuel, thus making the country less dependent on fuel from foreign suppliers. In the process, plutonium, which can be used for nuclear weapons, is also produced.

Mr. Bhutto has repeatedly said that Pakistan would not make a nuclear weapon, but since India used its reprocessing plant to do just that, the United States wants Pakistan —and other nations interested in reprocessing—to agree to the use of multinational reprocessing centers as an additional hedge against the spread of nuclear weapons.

[In Washington, Senator Abraham A. Ribicoff received a letter from Mr. Kissinger acknowledging for the first time that it was highly probable that India used material supplied by the United States in exploding its nuclear, device in 1974. Page 6.]



لہور،بھٹو، کسنجر اتے ایٹمی توانائی اتے ایٹم  بارے گفتگو۔۔

 ایہہ ملاقات بھٹو دی حکومت ٹٹن توں 11 مہینے پہلی دی ہے۔ری پراسیسنگ پلانٹ نال انڈیا تے پاکستان اپنے تونائی دے مسلے حل کر سکدے سن پر 1974 وچ انڈیا ایٹمی دھماکے پاروں اک نئی ایٹم بم ریس شروع کروا دتی۔اگلے 50 سال دونوں ملک ''تیل'' تے لمیاں رقماں لاندے رہے۔ ایہہ سب ایس آرٹیکل وچ ہیگا جے تسی ایس بارے سوچ سکو۔


Now read the article published in ew York Times at August 09, 1976

KISSINGER MEETS PAKISTANI LEADER ON NUCLEAR ISSUE

https://www.nytimes.com/1976/08/09/archives/kissinger-meets-pakistani-leader-on-nuclear-issue-talks-seek-to.html?searchResultPosition=7

LAHORE, Pakistan, Aug. 8—Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger arrived here tonight for talks with Prime Minister Zulfikar All Bhutto aimed at averting a crisis caused by Pakistan's refusal to drop plans to develop its own nuclear reprocessing plant despite intense American nressure.

Reporters aboard Mr. Kissinger's Air Force jet plane were told that the United States strongly opposed construction of the French‐designed plant on the ground that it had no economic justification and that, despite certain international) safeguards, it seemed likely to raise concern that Pakistan was planning to match India, by exploding a nuclear device of its own.

Plane Sale May Be Blocked

Because of this, Mr. Kissinger was reportedly ready to tell Mr. Bhutto not only• that the United States Government would not permit the sale of A‐7 Corsair jet fighter‐bombers to Pakistan but that Pakistan also ran a risk of having all its economic aid from the United States cut off under new law.

[In Washington, Senator Abraham A. Ribicoff received a letter from Mr. Kissinger acknowledging for the first time that it was highly probable that India used material supplied by the United States in exploding its nuclear, device in 1974. Page 6.]


At a dinner given by Prime Minister Bhutto tonight for Mr. Kissinger, the two men exchanged pointed, but humorous, barbs about the nuclear issue, which has become a major point of contention between the two nations in recent months. A reprocessing plant would produce as a byproduct, plutonium that could be used for making nuclear weapons.

Refusal Apparently Reaffirmed

Mr. Bhutto, referring to Lahore, the capital of Punjab, as the cultural center of Pakistan, said in his toast: “This is our reprocessing center, and we cannot in any way curb the reprocessing center in Pakistan.”

The dinner guests, highranking Pakistanis and Americans laughed at Mr. Bhutto's play on words in which he appeared publicly to reaffirm his refusal to change the plans for a nuclear reprocessing plant.

Mr. Kissinger, in his reply, said that governments must constantly review their policies —“to reprocess themselves”— and decide “what is worth reprocessing.”

The guests also applauded Mr. Kissinger's turn of phrase, which diplomatically called on Mr. Bhutto to alter his nuclear plans.

But although the dinner, in state guest house, was elegant and served by colorfully dressed Punjabis in a relaxed atmosphere, the main topic of conversation was concern over the severe floods that have de. stroyed about 3,000 villages in this area and left about hall of Lahore—mostly the old pail of the city—flooded.

Two Weeks of Rain

Pakistani officials said that the floods, caused by heavy downpour's over the last two weeks, were worse than those of 1973, when severe damage was inflicted.

Mr. Kissinger flew from Teheran, Iran, where he had spent the last three days, to Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, where he spent several hours talking with President Mohammad Daud before flying here. General Daud, who has been gradually seeking to widen ties with the United States and balance the strong Soviet influence in Afghanistan, had asked for a high‐ranking American to make a symbolic visit, reporters on Mr. Kissinger's plane were told.

The discussions with Mr. Bhutto that will take place tomorrow—in addition to the informal talks they had at dinner tonight—underscore the growing concern in Washington about the spread of nuclear weapons.

Pakistan has one small nuclear power reactor in Karachi, built with Canadian assistance. It plans to build 24 more medium‐size nuclear power plants and has contracted with France to build a reprocessing plant.

Disavowal by Bhutto

This plant would process spent uranium rods from nuclear reactors to prepare them for re‐use as fuel, thus making the country less dependent on fuel from foreign suppliers. In the process, plutonium, which can be used for nuclear weapons, is also produced.

Mr. Bhutto has repeatedly said that Pakistan would not make a nuclear weapon, but since India used its reprocessing plant to do just that, the United States wants Pakistan —and other nations interested in reprocessing—to agree to the use of multinational reprocessing centers as an additional hedge against the spread of nuclear weapons.

According to Mr. Kissinger, Shah Mohammed Riza Pahlevi agreed in the last few days that Iran would accept multinational reprocessing so long as the United States guaranteed a source of enriched uranium for the reactors Iran will buy from the United States.

In addition, the United States agreed that if Iran had to spend extra money for reprocessing abroad because of the American concern, a way should be found to recompense Iran, either by American assumptionl of the full cost or by its being shared by the two countries.

Mr. Kissinger would like the Pakistanis to accept the Iranian formula. Since Iran and Pakistan are close allies, It is thought possible that this will happen. In his toast, President Bhutto said that if the United States regarded Iran's security as important, it had to view Pakistan's in the same way. Mr. Kissinger said In response that Pakistan could count on the United States.

Curb on Aid Feared

The Pakistanis are worried about an amendment attached to the latest foreign aid authorization bill approved by Congress that bars any aid to a country that builds a reprocessing plant.

The law has many escape clauses, however, and at the moment the $160 million a year that Pakistan receives—more than half of it in food shipments—is not in danger. But Mr. Kissinger planned to tell Mr. Bhutto that the mood in Congress was for cutting off such aid if a reprocessing plant, was built.

Since March of last year Pakistan has been eligible to buy American military equipment, but so far it has limited its purchases to antitank missiles. The Pakistanis want sophisticated aircraft, but the quantities the Government seeks are viewed as too large by Washington, which also wants to use the plane purchases as leverage on the nuclear question.

Sunday, October 29, 2023

Partition 1947 & Denials from all the major players

Let us meet Dr Jhangier

 




A radio show with Dr Jhangier who belongs to Shakar Garh. An eye specialist by profession who born in Sialkot in 1958 and witnessed to many things of 1960s 1970s and onward. 

A vedio clip of the program 

https://youtu.be/IBuo3PyHUWM



Complete recording of the program recorded at 27 October 2023 MastFM103 Lhore Studios 

Click & Listen

Thursday, October 19, 2023

ٰIsrael Palestine conflict...Without immidiate ceasefire it will prove non starter

Amira Hass, Haaretz correspondent for the Occupied #Palestinian Territories, who is usually based in Ramallah and attended Wednesday's anti-occupation protest in Washington, D.C., organized by American #Jewish peace groups. Hass is the only #Israeli Jewish journalist to have spent 30 years living in and reporting from #Gaza and the West Bank.



Ceasefire is the only option to move forward, but recent visits of US & UK pandats failed to achive it. 

Monday, September 18, 2023

Issues of Democracy in Pakistan Lok Lhar show 2023

 



Issues of Democracy in Pakistan Lok Lhar show 2023

Why democracy is in struggle and why elite especially non elected elite has reservations with democracy. Who are the new and old power players? why the all love with undocumented economy? Although Charter of Democracy (May2006) and 18th amendment & NFC award (2010) strengthen democracy yet 3rd pillar , local self government is still missing. A separate chapter regarding LSG in the 1973 constitution is the essential missing part. How PTI govt in the Punjab and PPP in Sindh played with LSG laws. 

Program was recorded at MastFM103, Lhore at 15 September 2023, International Day for Democracy. 
Guests
Bushra Khaliq, WISE and Mudassar Farooq advocate

If we cannot challenge authoritarianism in our homes, offices, parties how can we strengthen democracy in the coutry?


Clip of Mudassar Farooq advocate




Saturday, August 26, 2023

A Spectre of Climate Change is haunting the Globe including Pakistan

 


A Spectre of Climate Change is haunting the Globe including PakistWatch the 


Watch & listen the 3 vedio clips and radio show, its all about Climate Change and its effects on Pakistani agriculture. 

Guests Asif Riaz, Sumeera Aslam & Mudabbar Ali in Punjabi radio program Lok Lhar recorded in August 2023


From Left: Asif Riaz, Smeera Aslam & Muddabar Ali @MastFM103 Lhore studios 


باجرا، سرسوں تے تل لاو، گنا نرا دریاواں تے کنڈیاں تے لاو جتھے پانی وادھو ہوئے، کسان مکئی ول تے جا رہیا ہے کیونجے ترے مہینے دی ایس فصل نال اوہ سال وچ ترے وار ایس نوں ویچ لیندا ہے۔ ملک وچ موسمیاتی وچار وٹاندرے نوں ویکھدے ہوئے پکا زرعی پلان کون بنائے گا؟ کھیتاں وچ کم کرن والیاں دے حقاں دی گل کون کرے گا کہ جس وچ وڈی گنتری زنانیاں دی ہے۔ کساناں دی کوآپریٹو بنن گیاں تے نکا کسان کارپوریٹ فارمنگ دا مقابلہ کر سکے گا۔ کسان کہندے جے کہ ملک پاکستان وچ ترے بادشاہ فصلاں جے اک گندم ، دوجی کپاہ تے تریجی چاول۔۔پر جے موسمیاتی تبدیلیاں نوں سامنے رکھدے ہوئے پکی پلاننگ نہ کیتی تے ایہہ شاہی مک سکدی جے۔نویں ٹرینڈاں بارے گل بات تسی سنو، کسان تے پانی وانگ اپنا رستہ بنا ہی لین گے پر سوال تے ایہہ ہے کہ ریاست کتھے ہیگی؟ ایہہ  گلاں سنو آپ، 

Clips of First program

Mudabbar Ali sharing his views

Sumera Aslam sharing her views

https://youtu.be/GhaWzoqYrIk

and

Asif Riaz views




Complete recording of the program

https://voca.ro/17UzK6QwkzeO

All the three guests work on the subject and shared their findings in a report for Sujag

Few extracts






The production of cotton in Sindh has decreased to 27%, while the area has reduced to 6%

For further refrence
https://loksujag.com/

Thursday, August 10, 2023

Background of the 11th August historic speech of Jinnah

 

Background of the 11th August historic speech of Jinnah 

At 11th August1947, it was 2nd day of the 1st parliamentary session, held before the formal birth of Pakistan. Mr Joginder Nath Mandal from East Bengal presided the assembly at first day (10th August, 1947). 54 members presented their credentials and at 2nd day 4 more members presented their credentials and it was a house of 58 members including 15 non Muslims and one women i-e Begum Jhan Ara Shahnawaz. Majority of members were from East Bengal. The House at 11th August elected its President and all members unanimously voted for Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. As par Assembly record, 6 people 6 members congratulated the President including the women member & M Ayub Khurro. Here you will read speech of Kiran Shankar Roy. That speech created the space for Jinnah to deliver 11th August historic and much stated speech. Although Jinnah touched vital issues of governance, partition and citizenship in it but we often ignore first two. Jinnah discussed law & order, bribery, nepotism, black marketing, corruption yet he mentioned these as legacy inherited from British India, he also said the history will decided about partition decision but in the 3rd part of the speech he supported equal citizen rights. Now you read Kiran Shankar Roy speech





Mr. Kiran Sankar Roy (East Bengal: General):

 Mr. President, on behalf of the Congress Party in this Assembly, I offer our most sincere congratulations to you, Sir, on your election as the President of the Pakistan Constituent Assembly.

Mr. President, in your most amazing career, one of the most brilliant that any Indian had, if I may say so without seeming to be patronising, you have received, Sir, .

An Honourable Member: We cannot catch your voice.

Mr. Kiran Sankar Roy: I shall try to raise my voice you have received many tokens of affection. You have had triumphs in many spheres of life, and when we compare all your achievements with the honour that this House is conferring on you, it may seem to be not very important. But Sir, I for one, congratulate you for having agreed to accept the Presidentship of this House. It is a wise decision. You, who have been the dreamer of Pakistan, now that your dream has been realised, should, as my friend the Honourable Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan said, be the architect of its constitution. You should now have the opportunity and the privilege of giving shape to your dream. As far as we are concerned, Sir, if the Pakistan which 'you have in your mind means a secular democratic State, a State which will make no difference between a citizen and a citizen, which will deal fairly with all irrespective of caste, creed or community, I assure you that you shall have our utmost co-operation.

If you will permit me, I would also like to state very briefly the policy which we Congressmen in this House would like to follow. Frankly, Sir, we are not very happy. We are unhappy because of this division of India. We are unhappy because/of the partition qf Punjab. We are also unhappy because of the partition of Bengal. But as this arrangement has been agreed upon by "the two great parties, we accept' it loyally, and shall work for it loyally. (Cheers.) We shall accept the citizenship of Pakistan with all its implications. (Cheers.) We would like to share all the difficulties and the risks, and surely there will be difficulties and risks at the birth of a new State. I say' we shall share all the difficulties and the risks as we hope to share the prosperity and happiness which we will jointly create in this new State. And in return, Sir, we shall expect the rights and privileges of the minority guaranteed in the constitution, guaranteed not only in the Constitution but actually respected in the day to day working of  the Government. When I say that, Sir, I realise that mere guarantee in the constitution is not enough. The other evening you rightly observed that what was wanted was mutual trust, mutual faith and mutual co- operation. I may once again assure you that there will be no want of trust and co-operation on our side (Cheers.)Sir, you have been a great leader of the Muslims. Time' has now come for you to take up the leadership of the State which includes not only Muslims, but Hindus and other communities. We invite you to that leadership and we will not fail to support you. When history writes its final judgment on your career, I hope, Sir, it will put it on record that you were not only a great leader of a great community, but you were also a great leader of an entire people of a State which you have brought into being. (Cheers.)

Sir, I once more offer you my sincerest congratulations.

CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY OF PAKISTAN 11th August 1947

Mr. Kiran Sankar Roy.

 





Friday, August 4, 2023

How August 05 exposed Modi, Imran & Trump

 



How August 05 exposed Modi, Imran & Trump

At 05 August 2019, few months before #Corona crisis, under Religio-nationalist zeal, Narinder Modi, in order to fix the biggest irritant (other major irritants are Indo-China border communities, Indian Muslims & Sikh Punjabis) had not only removed special status of Kashmir but also further divided it through a constitutional amendment that was in direct confrontation with India's international commitments. Ruling BJP & Modi who was elected 2nd time in May 2019 said in various statements that removal of special status of Kashmir was in their election manifesto. What Pakistan than govt did 65 days to stop Modi is a question that needs further probes? However, Pakistani PM, along with its handlers visited US in July 2019. Express Tribune reported at July 24, 2019 as, 



During the visit at 22 July it is repotted that US President told PM Pakistan that Indian PM wanted his help on Kashmir Issue but what help Modi needs was not clear. Trump played that diplomatic trick just before 12 days of August 05. Indeed, Modi needs US help so that like Sino-India conflict (1962) US should neutralize Pakistan reaction. As we knew that removal of the status of Kashmir was a vital strategic move and India would have planned it much before August 05. At that time everyone knew well that for US Anti-China policy, India is a key player (as suggested by H Kissinger in his 2013 book On China). Trump had already showed his Anti China cards well. But Pakistani PM was either living in fool's paradise or ready to appease US President for his own interests.... At July 22, 2019 it is reported


A boy told his friend that he want to marry with Anisa, his friend asked what the chances are, boy said 50-50. Atleast I am ready. 

 Next day not only CNN but also Guardian reported that India had denied it

Guardian 23 July 2019

same day CNN too repoted it 

India denies that Trump was invited to mediate Kashmir conflict after social media firestorm

But Imran Khan after his arrival at Islamabad called it a victory similar to Cricket World Cup. 

At 24 July 2019, BBC reported his statement as

عمران خان: ’ایسا لگا ہے کہ میں کسی باہر کے دورے سے نہیں آرہا بلکہ ورلڈ کپ جیت کر آیا ہوں‘

After 9 days, Modi did August 05 and US helped him by not objecting Unlike it did after Ukrine crisis. So Modi definately nedded that help. 

In his article of August 30, 2019 Imran Khan had accepted that he had an eye on May 30th Indian election than what was his prepration? 

we assumed that Mr. Modi’s increasingly hard-line positions and his rhetoric against Pakistan were aimed to whip up a nationalist frenzy among the Indian voters with an eye on the Indian elections in May.

After August 05, 2019 it was useless to say ''If the world does nothing to stop the Indian assault on Kashmir and its people, two nuclear-armed states will get ever closer to a direct military confrontation.'' It proved a lame excuse only. 

It is important to understand what Pakistani FO had suggested him since May 30th. 

After August 05, Imran Khan announced that along with public he will protest every Friday for few hours but he did it only for one time. 

August 05, gave an opportunity to China and he said remember we are a party in Kashmir dispute.

Indeed India had violated two UNSC resolutions 1949 & 1971 and after August 05, 2019, UNSC resolution of 21st December 1971 has been invoked. The case of Kashmir special status is in Indian SC. India is signatory of its UN commitments and at least in Simla agreement 1972 and Lhore Declaration of Feb 1999 India accepted Kashmir as bilateral issue

It is 4rth year now, but Modi could not neutralize Kashmir, Occupied Kashmir was already under Indian control since 1947 so that strategic move of August 05, 2019 proved an atempt to convert the converted only. It only give India more bad name in the world of nations. It is said that special status to Kashmir was a trick with international community but actually Indian establishment remained waiting for an opportunity for its merger. 

Modi visited US in September 2019, just one month after August 05 but Trump failed to raise August 05 issue and that compromise exposed his gangster image too. 

 After August 05, in Pakistan many people including PDM opposition alliance showed suspicions of tricky mediation led by Trump. They believed that Kashmir issue was sold. Regarding tricky mediations a Pakistani traditional rightist media group newspaper had published a cartoon. 

 



After some pressure from Anti media policies of Khan government the Newspaper the Nation published an apology


But infect, it was true and it proved true after 4 years too. There was no mediation on the agenda, no FO ever worked on it , The game exposed well when Trump said there is50% chances of mediation as Pakistan is ready only. Aljazeera reported at 24rth September  when Trump met with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York on Monday, a day after accompanying Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a political event in Houston.



From People point of view, August 05, exposed Imran Khan, its handlers, Modi and Trump well. Kashmir was an issue and still it is an important issue. India want to play a role of responsible nation but after August 05, it failed to respect its own international commitments. 



A pice written at 13th August 2019

A pice written at 24rth August 2019

Followers of Zia's language Policy & literature festivals ضیاالحق دے لسانی سجن اتے ادبی کانفرنساں

  Followers of Zia's language Policy & literature festivals It was dictator Zia ul Hoq who not only played sectarian card but also d...